FinTech: Add a Feature (Parental Controls) 2025

6 Weeks

Sole UX Designer

Figma, Miro, Zoom

Protection you can bank on

The Greenlight debit card parental controls feature gives parents and kids an extra layer of financial protection.

Parents can:

  • View shared monthly spending reports

  • Block and/or flag a vendor or merchant category

  • Set authorized payment amounts on individual transactions

  • Create alerts for restricted transaction attempts, suspicious transactions, spending alerts (over a specified amount) and balances that fall below a certain threshold (low balance alert)

The Problem

Financial cybercrime is on the rise. The FBI says it jumped 33% in 2024, resulting in $16-billion in losses. And while older adults are the most frequent victims, children are acutely susceptible to phishing scams, unathorized purchases, identity theft and fraud -particularly within online gaming platforms- according to Common Sense Media. At the same time, 96% of Gen Z consumers (Greenlight’s target audience) make digital purchases, positioning them as the largest cohort of online shoppers.

While most credit cards extend their customers some degree of financial protection, it’s crucial a debit card used primarily by kids and teens offer additional tools to families in order to safeguard kids from scammers, hackers and other schemes that target vulnerable populations - both online and in-person.

Research

  • Competitor Analysis

  • User Interviews

  • Personas

  • Affinity Mapping

  • POVs/HMWs

Design

  • User/Task Flows

  • Feature Set

  • Style Tile

  • Mid/High-Fidelity Wireframes

Delivery

  • Prototypes

  • Usability Testing

  • Iterations

  • Final Product

Persona

The Research

Competitor Analysis: I compared the strengths, weaknesses and various features of three different checking accounts aimed at kids and teens, including: Capital One Money Teen Checking, Bank of America Safebalance for Family Banking, and Axos First Checking. Two of the three offered parental control options, though at least one (Capital One Money Teen Checking) was fairly limited. Axos was the only card to offer parents to option to block certain spending categories, though they offered no other parental controls, such as spending limits, or establishing authorized payment amounts. I ultimately decided to pull inspiration from all three competitors, as I found combining the features of all three made for a well-rounded, and robust system of protection.

User Interviews: I conducted remote interviews with a total of five parents between the ages of 46-51, though one participant used the card primarily for her elderly father and not her teen boys. Though all my users were “Core” customers (Greenlight’s basic level of service) they enjoyed very different aspects of the card. All of them expressed interest in more substantial parental controls and oversight.

Personas: I based my persona on a 46-year-old mother of three, who uses the card for her two older children, and likes the convenience of sending money hassle-free. Like other users, she appreciates the ability to track and assign chores. Though she’s generally optimistic about financial technology tools like Greenlight, she’s unsure if they offer the same level of protection as traditional banking institutions.

Affinity Mapping: I searched for similarities and themes in the responses of my five participants, and divided them into the following categories: emotional response to financial technology; why they chose Greenlight over other options; goals and motivations, how the card was used and where, technical pain points, product pain points, outcome of product use, and what they thought about adding more robust parental controls?

POVs/HMWs: I explored the following POVs and HMWs: Helping parents block or flag their children’s financial transactions and set vendor/merchant restrictions in a user-friendly, timely and effective manner; Helping parents and kids navigate unauthorized or suspicious transactions in a way that is not burdonsome or obtrusive; Giving parents visibility of transactions as they are occurring in real-time.

Insights

All of my users stressed their appreciation for the card’s convenience and ease of use, and many pointed to the added benefit of teaching their kids money management skills and financial independence. Despite this, all of them were enthusiastic about the ability to proactively block an individual vendor or merchant category, as well as the option to approve a purchase in real-time that exceeds a pre-specified dollar amount.

Breakdowns:

  • More than half of the families interviewed use the cards online

  • 100% participate in the basic “Core” level of service, which currently doesn’t offer any financial monitoring or identity theft protection

  • Most commonly cited goals for card usage were convenience and independence

  • All participants expressed an interest in more robust parental controls and oversight

The Goal

My users value convenience and independence. It was the most often-cited reason they chose to use Greenlight in the first place. As such, my number one goal was to make the parental controls feature as accessible and unobtrusive as possible while still providing parents with the safeguards they desire. With this in mind, I embraced flexibility and developed a “before” and “after” mindset. All of the features I developed as part of my parental controls can be enacted before the card is ever used, and after a purchase is discovered. Likewise, all blocks can be viewed or changed at any time with the touch of a button. Lastly, shared spending reports and alerts between parents and kids give them a sense of agency and helps to instill financial independence, which was a top priority for parents.

User Flows

User/Task Flows: I mapped out three user flows including: Blocking/Flagging an individual transaction; Block by merchant category; Review blocked/flagged transactions. These flows were chosen as they best demonstrate the priority features of my parental controls page.

Feature Set: My must-have features include: Block/flag vendor/merchant category; Suspicious transaction alerts; and Blocked merchant/vendor lists. Nice to have features include: Child-friendly financial report; Direct-deposit; and PIN reminders. Surprising and delightful features include: Graduated accounts, and Custom UI views.

Style Tile: As this is an established brand, I stayed true to the organization’s color palette, style, logo and font. In lieu of their custom font, I used Manrope - a clean, san-serif font - in various weights, for the headlines and text, which is clean and easy to read. I also downloaded various user screens from their press kit to mimic the basic look and feel of the app, including the spacing, components, and iconography used in their existing UI.

Mid/High Fidelity-Wireframes: I developed mid and high-fidelity wireframes of the three user/task flows, and ran a total of two usability tests, with early user feedback integrated into the later testing of my high-fidelity prototypes.

The Design

Mid-Fidelity Wireframes

Task flow #2: Block a merchant category (Mature content)

High-Fidelity Wireframes

Task flow #3: View list of blocked vendors

High-Fidelity Prototype

Key Findings/Observations

Almost all of my users were able to complete task flow #1 (Block an individual vendor) in under a minute, and found the navigation to be easy and fairly intuitive once they clicked on the “View All Transactions” list. Of the three task flows, this task took the longest to complete possibly because the set-up was more complicated or was in some way unclear. It was also the first task presented in each scenario, which could also play a role as users are learning to navigate the prototype.

The second task (Block a group of vendors or merchant category) was very intuitive and the navigation was clear, though it was more information to parse through than the previous task. Users loved the addition of the Parental Controls page but found it to be a bit text-heavy, and sometimes had a hard time differentiating between action items versus items to review. Overall, users found this task easy to navigate and made almost no errors.

Task flow #3 (Review a list of blocked vendors and merchant categories) was the easiest to navigate and also included the fewest screens. Having familiarized themselves with the “Parental Controls” in the previous task, users had a much easier time identifying the section header for the list of blocked sellers. Overall, users had no problems completing this task and found it very intuitive.

 

Prototyping/Usability Testing: I conducted remote usability testing of high-fidelity prototypes with five participants on three different task flows.

Task flows/results were as follows:

Task flow #1: Block an individual vendor

  • Average time to complete task: (:52) Median Score: (:45)

  • Median number of errors: 2

  • Median usability score (10 being the easiest; 1 being the hardest): 8

Task flow #2: Block a group of vendors or merchant category

  • Average time to complete task: (:37) Median Score: (:30)

  • Median number of errors: 0

  • Median usability score: 10

Task flow #3: Review a list of blocked vendors and merchant categories

  • Average time to complete task: (:22) Median Score: (:20)

  • Median number of errors: 0

  • Median usability score : 10

Delivery

Original

Iteration

Iterations

The iteration illustrated here was based on feedback from task flows #2 and #3 (Block a group of vendors or merchant category; Review a list of blocked vendors/merchant categories) to create more “white space” as the original was a bit text-heavy and hard to read. Users also suggested simplifying and shortening the descriptions and putting the headings in bold font. Finally, they recommended adding icons to the headings to further clarify the action or expected outcome.

From task flow #1, iterations included:

  • Including a link to parental controls under the “Manage Card” option as this was often the first place users clicked.

  • Adding a short description under the “Manage Card” button to specify its scope/function

Reflection/Next Steps

You know what economy cars and high-end vehicles have in common? Seatbelts. Why? Because consumers deserve to feel safe - both on the road and online. Safety is a neccessity, not a luxery. Yet, all of my users were customers of Greenlight’s lowest-tier plan, which doesn’t offer the same safety features as their premium plan. And when kids are involved, the stakes are arguably higher. Going forward, I would implement not only all of the safety features outlined in this case study, but I would ensure it was available to customers at every price point. In addition, I would further develop aspects of the Parental Controls page, including the monthly snapshots and reports. I would also refine the search process for vendors and merchant categories by conducting more user testing to better understand parents’ specific concerns. Finally, I would assess how users prefer to interact with features such as alerts and messaging, including how, when and where to apply them.

Understanding user’s motives and expectations frames at least half of my design, but the other half is framed by their values. Safety was a top priority for my users (and parents, in general), but it shouldn’t come at the cost of convenience. And it certainly shouldn’t cost extra. The key is finding the center of that Venn Diagram - combining the “right-now” convenience they expect, with the independence they hope to foster in the future, with the everyday safety they deserve.

The Final Product

Task Flow #1: Block a vendor

Set-up: You spot an unfamiliar transaction and you want to block future purchases. Block the vendor, “Roblox”